Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Reason.tv: The Meaning of Socialism: National Review's Kevin Williamson

By the Left Coast Rebel




My favorite part of the video is at the 4:15 mark. Nick Gillespie asks National Review's Kevin Williamson, "what's the continuing romance of socialism?" Williamson simply responds, "I think it is a form of perpetual adolescence..."

This truism -- the perpetual adolescence of advocates of socialism, especially in academia and the youth -- is absolutely spot on and something that I have witnessed over and over first hand. Socialist proponents (who hide under the veil of "progressive" today) exist in a pre-pubescent fairy-tale-land of candy-pooping unicorns and government-commanded utopia. "Just give up this freedom, here, and everything will be taken care of," they whisper in our ears. Too many of us fall for the ploy.

It's too bad that history is littered with the dead bodies, misery and poverty (both economically and spiritually) that socialism ushers in.

It's doubly frightful that we seem to have not learned from said history, or -- eve worse -- are willfully ignoring it in favor of a pie-in-the-sky adolescent vision -- a vision that both you and I know will have the precise same historical outcome here in the United States.

From Reason.tv's Youtube page:
What's the real definition of socialism? How is it distinct from regulation and a social welfare state? Why are intellectuals still enamored of a system that brought us Stalin, Hitler, and more recently Hugo Chavez and Kim Jong-Il? And what can the United States learn from Sweden about free enterprise and capitalism?

Reason.tv's Nick Gillespie sat down with Kevin Williamson, who is deputy managing editor of National Review and author of a new book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism, to discuss the meaning of socialism in history and the current moment.
Cross posted to LCR contributor sites.

4 comments:

  1. "I think it is a form of perpetual adolescence..."

    I mentioned that to one of my liberal friends and he stamped his little feet and said, "Am not, neither!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Heh, so did I, Proof. So did I. Actually, my friend threw his rubber ducky across the room ;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Come on now. I doubt that you have any friends, let alone liberal friends! Most people choose not be friends with snotty pricks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Most people choose not be friends with snotty pricks." Come on, now! Not all liberals are snotty pricks, Nony! None of my friends, anyway. I'll bet your mom had to hang a pork chop around your neck, just to get the dog to play with you.

    ReplyDelete