by guest blogger Andrew Roman
_______________________
Yes, liberals live (and love) to ban things. If they could, they'd
ban more. It's that we're allowed to do so many things and make our own choices
that causes them so much distress. And in circumstances where an outright ban
isn't possible (e.g, guns), they are madly infatuated with imposing restrictions.
Modern liberalism has shown us that the road to Utopia - ever under-construction
and always under-funded - is more easily navigated when those who know
what is good for us (and the Earth) remove these hazardous obstacles.
For instance, if the planet could communicate directly with us (outside of the melting glaciers and mounting polar bear corpses), no doubt she
would breathe a much-needed sigh of relief now that the Los Angeles City Council has banned
plastic bags from super markets. The environment-crippling single-use plastic bag is slated to
be replaced with that dinosaur of free-market-transport: the paper bag ...
which, incidentally, was replaced many years ago by the very same plastic bags that
are now being banned from use. Something about
saving the earth, if I recall. The ban is intended to reduce the amount of
garbage in landfills, cut back on litter and show the environment some love.
But facts are pesky things. They can burst blissful bubbles
and annoy the self-congratulatory well-intentioned.
Plastic bags make up less
than one half of one percent of all garbage in the State of California.
Plastic bags make up a full one percent - that's one part out of a hundred - of all
litter nation-wide.
These same plastic bags make up nearly two percent of all plastic debris found on beaches or in the oceans.
That we have anything left alive in our seas is astonishing.
Let us not forget about the jobs that could potentially be
lost domestically thanks to the ban. Yes, plastic grocery-store bags are
manufactured right here in the good old U-S-of-A. And what of the inescapable trouble that will
arise from those disgusting bacteria-laden
reusable bags that are now being pushed by environmentalists? (Most of them are made in China, by the way). Would
you put your peaches in one of those things?
To hell with those perfectly sanitary, fish-killing, dump-filling, beach-trashing,
dog-poop-picker-uppers! I demand my right to acquire E.coli while saving the planet!
Next, a riddle...
If a million people tried doing serious damage to the environment
by getting together, say in Central Park, and pressing a million asthma
inhalers simultaneously into the air, how many holes in the ozone layer could
be created? How many species could be eliminated from an already fragile
collection of eco-systems teetering on the brink? How many degrees could surface temperatures across the globe by ratcheted up? What would the
caribou death count be?
Thank goodness that these noxious threats to the ozone layer are
being phased out.
Whether or not President Obama's EPA is aware that people
who use these over-the-counter inhalers actually release the chemicals
contained in them into their own bodies
and not into the atmosphere is unclear at this time.
Not to worry, though. Prescription inhalers cost at least
three times as much as the over-the-counter variety being banned. After all, asthma sufferers were looking for
ways to spend more money on their life-saving medications, weren't they?
There is solace in knowing the carbon footprint of the
United States will be that much smaller.
Here in New York City, where banning things is a way of
life, our King - Michael Bloomberg, his most exalted majesty - has once again kicked
aside an obtrusive roadblock on the path to sweet Utopia by telling us yet again what is good for us. (If not
for him, how many dead would litter our streets like so many banned plastic
grocery bags?) Recall, he rescued us by
banning certain cooking oils in privately owned restaurants. (Yes, in privately owned restaurants). He banned smoking
in bars. (Yes, in privately owned bars).
He has waged war on salt, forced calorie counts to be posted in restaurants,
usurped the will of the people by thumbing his nose to term limits, extended
the welcome mat to illegals, and rejected the real purpose of government - that is, to protect freedom Rather, he has used elected
office as a platform to hoist personal feelings about the morality of health upon
the rest of us.
The King has proposed - and will almost certainly get - a
ban on all sugared drinks in containers that measure larger than sixteen ounces.
This is not a joke. It isn't a Rush Limbaugh parody, a
Saturday Night Live bit or a Mad Magazine spread.
Michael Bloomberg, from on high, has decided that it will be
illegal - yes, illegal - to fill a
cup larger than sixteen ounces with non-diet soda and other sweet drinks in any of the five boroughs
of New York City.
Illegal.
Say goodbye to super-sized sodas. Say goodbye to choice. Say
goodbye to liberty. Say goodbye to sanity.
Say howdy to more big, intrusive government.
Say hi to unabashed liberalism.
Say hi to unabashed liberalism.
The Bloomberg ban would affect restaurants, street carts,
delis, movie theaters, stadiums and arenas. Yes, that means that it will be against the law to buy a 32-ounce
Mountain Dew at Yankee Stadium to wash down my Nachos, but perfectly fine to buy
seven beers before the first pitch is ever thrown.
Such thinkers, these
liberals.
The ban wouldn't apply to diet drinks, fruit juices, booze or
even milk shakes - because it is common knowledge that large quantities of ice
cream and whole milk are better for you than a jumbo Coke .
To be fair, the ban would not include bottled soda in grocery stores and convenience stores,
but would wipe out the famed Big Gulp.
I can see it all now.
The scene is a 7-11 convenience store somewhere near Bay
Ridge, Brooklyn. It's lunchtime. A pickup truck packed with construction
workers pulls up. Out come four hungry, thirsty he-men. One of the guys,
parched from a hot summer's morning of work on the new office building across
4th Avenue, grabs a Big Gulp cup and places it underneath the dispenser at the
soda machine. His arid throat tingles as he anticipates the rush of icy cold
Coke about to pour in, squelching the burn of his thirst, soothing his
overworked body.
As the man's Big Gulp cup - built for 32 ounces of pure refreshment
- fills past the half-way point with frosty Coca Cola, three red lights suddenly
emerge from the front of the machine and begin flashing in rapid sequence. The
machine immediately shuts itself down as two iron-pronged grills slam down in front
of the dispenser. An alarm sounds. The store clerks quickly put on their protective
eye gear and duck behind the display of
black-and-white cookies. Customers scatter. A woman screams.
The store's front door is bolted shut as a nine inch thick steel
titanium bar is lowered from behind the portrait of Mayor Mike Bloomberg above
the lottery ticket wheels. Simultaneously, two metal rods project from the
sides of the soda machine, expanding themselves toward the Big Gulp cup from
either direction until they penetrate the cup, piercing the skin, causing the Coca
Cola to empty into the overrun pan. The straws and cup lids are electronically sealed
behind bullet-proof glass from a remote location. The Slurpee machine melts
into a pool of molten metal.
Before he can process all that has happened, the thirsty man
is surrounded. In an instant, someone
starts reading him his rights as his wrists feel the cold steel of the cuffs
clenching down. It's all over within thirty seconds, and it's all for his own
good.
Voices within the store begin to buzz: "Shoulda went
with the diet" ..... "It's really for the best." A couple of the older men - grizzled nanny-state
veterans - reflexively suck in their
guts as they watch the man escorted from the premises. "I don't touch the
stuff anymore myself," one says to another. "Does he want to die young or something?"
another one nervously asks out loud. An old lady in a rocking chair chuckles
uncontrollably. Some begin looking around, anticipating an appearance from King
Mike himself. "Another life saved!" someone calls out from just
beyond the rotating sausages. "It's for our own good," a mother
of nine affirms.
And just like that, life returns to normal in the Brooklyn
7-11.
One of the men from the pickup truck buys two 16-ounce cups of icy cold Coke
without incident. Another buys a 20-ounce bottle of Pepsi from the cooler,
while the third says he is going to the Baskin Robins across the street for a large ice cream soda.
Now seriously....
Is this idiocy really
about health? Does anyone in their heart of hearts genuinely believe this entire power play is about curbing obesity?
What's to prevent people from buying multiple cups of
smaller sized soda? What's to keep people from their free refills in fast food joints? If this is really about cutting back on fat, why not just close down
the bakeries? Or put restrictions on the number of Kit Kats allowed per household? Or limit potato chip consumptions to one bag a week. Or pizza
delivery to two medium pies every ten days? Or mandate that no one within the
five boroughs can sit down to watch any television program with less than two
vegetable servings and a fruit platter?
There is so much asininity in this proposal that
environmentalists would have me hung for the amount of trees it'd take to
supply the paper I would need to list the ways.
People are living longer than ever before. And if you properly
adjust statistics by taking away those that die in car accidents and are
murdered , the United States has the highest life expectancy on Earth.
In reality, this is a freedom-curbing intolerable intrusion into
our lives that has nothing - repeat, nothing
- to do with improving the health of our citizenry. Ultimately, regardless
of intention, this is only about
expansive government. It is about making the individual even smaller in the
shadow of a growing state. It is about shrinking liberty. It is about the right of the people to be able to make personal
choices that were never intended to the fall under the awning of the power of government. Free people must have the right to make these
decisions themselves, good or bad. Indeed, choices have consequences, but none
so menacing as allowing government to
take away - ban - things it deems as
a "public concern."
Where is the line?
Where does it stop?
Human beings just don't know when to say when.
C.S Lewis wrote, "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised
for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to
live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber
baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be
satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without
end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
Go ahead and redefine the millennia-old definition of
marriage. Please feel free to terminate as many unborn children as you wish. Hand out condoms to school children as you see
fit.
But don't you dare
put seventeen ounces of Sunkist Orange in a cup in this city.
Incidentally, today is the 75th Annual National Donut Day in New York.
That's right, National Donut Day.
Our Majesty-In-Chief will be out and about today celebrating this internationally heralded health food, culminating in a proclamation letter written by ... himself.
Can a Boston cream donut even fit in one of those Big Gulp cups?
----
Incidentally, today is the 75th Annual National Donut Day in New York.
That's right, National Donut Day.
Our Majesty-In-Chief will be out and about today celebrating this internationally heralded health food, culminating in a proclamation letter written by ... himself.
Can a Boston cream donut even fit in one of those Big Gulp cups?
----
Well said, my friend! You got me to thinking...what if, as an act of civil disobedience of sorts (I say "of sorts", because it doesn't sound as if there's a statute against it), New Yorkers brought their own containers to lunch or dinner, ordered two or more 16 oz drinks and then poured them into one container to enjoy while they ate? Would Nanny McFee have an aneurysm?
ReplyDeleteThat is why, among many other reasons, this entire thing is as ridiculous as it is dangerous. This is a BIG DEAL. I've talked to a few folks who are sympathetic to the proposal, and they seem to think this is really just a symbolic move. But I disagree. This proposal cannot simply be a symbolic gesture on their part because no one is claiming it is. No one is saying, "Well, we know this won't make a difference in the overall fight against obesity, but it is an important statement of public policy." No, this is DELIBERATE incremental erosion of liberty. You see, the sinister nature of this kind of move isn't readily apparent, but it surely exists. In and of itself, this proposal doesn't seem THAT outrageous to many on the left because, technically, we can still have as much real soda as we wish. Complaining about governmental encroachment seems silly - parhaps even paranoid - to that side because, as of right now, no one is saying that Coke and Pepsi are unavailable in as much quantity as one wishes. But, what is the next step? Banning purchases of two 16-ounce cups at one time? Confisacting containers as per state edict? How outrageous will any of that actually be in light of this government grab? There is a reason we are all reacting as we are to this....even many libs are saying this is going too far. sadly, this will probably pass because the NYC Health gang were all appointed by His Majesty.
ReplyDeleteWith liberals, liberty is a one way ratchet. Whether it's the size of your toilet tank, or the content of your light bulbs or a convoluted soda law that make no real world sense, every erosion of liberty seems to be nearly impossible to get back. And hordes of government bureaucrats, whose livelihood depends on the regulatory labyrinth are there to make sure the erosion is permanent.
Delete