Why so serious?I'd give it four out of five stars.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
The Dark Knight
First, I read the whole "W" is Batman thing and, yes, I could see a little bit of it in one or two places, but the idea that George W. Bush would put on a cape and bitchslap Nancy Pelosi...well...there's always the sequel!
There's a lot to see in the film, a lot going on with a number of subplots weaving their way through the movie. The special effects are awesome. A lot of movies have you looking behind the curtain, looks for the wires and the glass paintings, but this one looked seamless!
Heath Ledger's Joker was a refreshing, if frightening change from Nicholson's over the top ham & cheese performance of the past. Ledger portrayed the psychotic killer as...a psychotic killer. The humor was there, but very dark.
Spoiler alert: If you haven't seen the movie, stop reading here.
There won't be a problem in maintaining continuity for Bruce Wayne's love interest Rachel (portrayed here by Maggie Gyllenhaal, Katie Holmes in Batman Begins).
I'm thinking a small piece of granite could fill in for her in the sequel!
An exciting thrill ride, punctuated by a few too many talking head moments. Worth the price of admission, but anyone who paid $150 to sit in a sold out theater to watch this one may be asking himself:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
i still wish Katie Holmes had stayed on board as Rachel Dawes for the Dark Knight; it was like the time spent getting familiar with her character in Batman Begins was wasted...
ReplyDeleteI know what you mean. It's hard enough to suspend disbelief with some movies and then have to suspend further disbelief that one of the characters got taller/shorter, slimmer/wider, morphed from blode to brunette or vice versa and speaks with a different accent!
ReplyDeleteThey should do like they did LOTR: Lock everyone up on the far side of the world until you've made all the sequels you intend to! Heh.