It gets old...telling people you are from California and either receiving that sad eyed, mournful "Poor baby!" look, or always having to explain that, yes, I am in my right mind, and no, I don't see any hope with liberals running the state. So, I've decided, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em! Since there are splinter groups calling southern California, "Northern Mexico", I don't see why I can't just rename my part of the state, Baja British Columbia! It has a much nicer ring to it, don't you think?
And since I may be the leading, and only, literary light in Baja British Columbia (pop. 1), I should have a proper title. I'm trying to choose between 'the Sage of Southern BC', or 'the Bard of Baja British Columbia'. I'm leaning towards the latter... I'm wondering if I should get a new passport?
Posts
Thank you for not including SF in my new country.
ReplyDeleteNot a problem! There are those who would split the state around Fresno and stick us with SF. San Fran Nan needs to stick with her amigos in 'Northern Mexico'!
DeleteProof, you blew it, Dude. I'm surprised Inno didn't spot it. You've included Seattle, Portland, and Humboldt County in you new map, as liberal (almost) as San Francisco. I look forward to your future map making endeavors.
ReplyDeleteI considered that. I thought we could grant them amnesty and grant them safe passage until they could relocate to an area surrounded by fewer rednecks, patriots and gun owners.
DeleteJoining Canada may not be so bad, but you have to remember Proof, British Columbia (BC) is our left coast. In other words you'd be joining California North. If you can guarantee that Northern California (+ anything else you've annexed for your idea; like Seattle) would make BC less liberal and not more liberal, I'd be all for it.
ReplyDeleteI think we just import the joys of gun ownership and self reliance, and the BC's will come right around!
Delete