This Last Week's Poll

This Last Week's Poll question was: Who is the Biggest Fraud?

Rachel Dolezal (2%)

Elizabeth Warren (4%)

Hillary Clinton (56%)

Ward Churchill (6%)

Al Sharpton (29%)

The clear victor is Hillary Clinton! This is not to say that of the five, all coincidentally Democrats, that the other four were not also frauds, only that Hillary was, as the poll asked, the biggest fraud.

Al Sharpton came in second. Fake Indians Ward Churchill and Lizzie Warren came in third and fourth, with Rachel "Whatchu talkin' about Willis" Dolezal appropriately bringing up the rear.



Multiple choices and Obama's crack budget office accountants may account for totals greater than 100%

Thank you for your participation!
Not a scientific poll. Respondents are self selecting. Questions are drawn from fortune cookies, hieroglyphics and tomorrow’s New York Times.

Please make your opinion known in this week's poll.

Ward Churchill, Faux Indian Leftist Educator, Loses in CO Supreme Court

Ward Churchill, Leftist Educator, a plagiarist like Joe Biden, a Faux Indian, long before Elizabeth Warren discovered she was 1/32 Cherokee, has lost his bid before the Colorado Supreme Court to get his old job back, after he compared 9/11 victims to Adolph Eichmann.


Ward Churchill, lost his appeal to get his job back after he compared Sept. 11 victims with a Nazi, will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court after the Colorado Supreme Court ruled against him.

His termination in 2007 came after an essay he wrote describing some victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as "little Eichmanns," a reference to Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi leader who helped orchestrate the Holocaust.

In its ruling, the Colorado Supreme Court said Churchill had five opportunities to present his own witnesses, cross-examine opposing witnesses and argue his case before the board following allegations Churchill plagiarized some of his academic writings, fabricated evidence and violated the university's academic standards.

"Although we are mindful that a full-fledged, years-long investigation into a professor's academic record taken in bad faith could chill the continued exercise of free speech, we conclude that the federal case law in this area is too unsettled to defeat the regents' claim of qualified immunity," the state Supreme Court judges ruled.

A civil jury in 2009 found the school unlawfully fired Churchill but awarded him only $1 in damages. However, a Denver District judge set aside the verdict and said university regents, who are elected, are a "quasi-judicial" panel with immunity from the lawsuit.

Couldn't happen to a nicer phony.


Cross posted at LCR, Say Anything.